Alternatives to the traditional real estate commissions
At a recent convention Steve Levitt, the author of "Freakonomics," shared some interesting facts and views about the real estate industry. He has been criticized by the National Association of Realtors and many agents for his prediction for the future of the real estate industry. His findings include:
- Due to low entry barriers for new real estate agents the median income has not increased over the last 10 years even though prices are up almost 70 percent in some places.
- Real estate agents tend to sell their own homes for about 3 percent more than the selling price of their clients’ homes.
- Real estate agents tend to leave their own homes on the market about 10 percent longer than their clients’.
He also shared a story criticizing the ethical motivations of real estate agents citing a personal experience. He contacted the listing agent of a home he was interested in order to determine a minimum offer that would be considered by the seller. The agent then explained the seller would be willing to accept offers significantly lower than the asking price so she could pocket an extra $20,000 to 30,000 in commissions costing her clients over $50,000. Sound fair? This problem certainly would not be encountered using a flat fee MLS service, where you - the seller - are in control of the transaction. Cost effective alternatives like flat fee MLS provide a viable option for home sellers and for sale by owners to market their homes. In fact Levitt explains he thinks flat fee MLS and limited service brokers will provide the knockout punch to the traditional model.
See Also
- ‘Freaky’ side of real estate economics
Flat-fee brokers may put pressure on traditional commissions
